Search for: All records

Abstract Lack of rigorous reproducibility and validation are significant hurdles for scientific development across many fields. Materials science, in particular, encompasses a variety of experimental and theoretical approaches that require careful benchmarking. Leaderboard efforts have been developed previously to mitigate these issues. However, a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking on an integrated platform with multiple data modalities with perfect and defect materials data is still lacking. This work introduces JARVIS-Leaderboard, an open-source and community-driven platform that facilitates benchmarking and enhances reproducibility. The platform allows users to set up benchmarks with custom tasks and enables contributions in the form of dataset, code, and meta-data submissions. We cover the following materials design categories: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Electronic Structure (ES), Force-fields (FF), Quantum Computation (QC), and Experiments (EXP). For AI, we cover several types of input data, including atomic structures, atomistic images, spectra, and text. For ES, we consider multiple ES approaches, software packages, pseudopotentials, materials, and properties, comparing results to experiment. For FF, we compare multiple approaches for material property predictions. For QC, we benchmark Hamiltonian simulations using various quantum algorithms and circuits. Finally, for experiments, we use the inter-laboratory approach to establish benchmarks. There are 1281 contributions to 274 benchmarks using 152 methods with more than 8 million data points, and the leaderboard is continuously expanding. The JARVIS-Leaderboard is available at the website:https://pages.nist.gov/jarvis_leaderboard/ 

Abstract The interface between cathode and electrolyte is a significant source of large interfacial resistance in solid‐state batteries (SSBs). Spark plasma sintering (SPS) allows densifying electrolyte and electrodes in one step, which can improve the interfacial contact in SSBs and significantly shorten the processing time. In this work, we proposed a two‐step joining process to prepare cathode (LiCoO₂, LCO)/electrolyte (Li_0.33La_0.57TiO₃, LLTO) half cells via SPS. Interdiffusion between Ti^4+/Co³⁺was observed at the interface by SEM/STEM, resulting in the formation of the Li−Ti−La−Co−O and Li−Ti−Co−O phases in LLTO and the Li−Co−Ti−O phase in LCO. Computational modeling was performed to verify that the Li−Ti−Co−O phase has a LiTi₂O₄host lattice. In a study of interfacial electrical properties, the resistance of this interdiffusion layer was found to be 10⁵ Ω, which is 40 times higher than the resistance of the individual LLTO phase. The formation of an interdiffusion layer is identified as the origin of the high interface resistance in the LLTO/LCO half‐cell. 

Abstract Layered transition‐metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have shown promise to replace carbon‐based compounds as suitable anode materials for Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) owing to facile intercalation and de‐intercalation of lithium (Li) during charging and discharging, respectively. While the intercalation mechanism of Li in mono‐ and bi‐layer TMDs has’ been thoroughly examined, mechanistic understanding of Li intercalation‐induced phase transformation in bulk or films of TMDs is still largely unexplored. This study investigates possible scenarios during sequential Li intercalation and aims to gain a mechanistic understanding of the phase transformation in bulk MoS₂using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The manuscript examines the role of concentration and distribution of Li‐ions on the formation of dual‐phase 2H‐1T microstructures that have been observed experimentally. The study demonstrates that lithiation would proceed in a systematic layer‐by‐layer manner wherein Li‐ions diffuse into successive interlayer spacings to render local phase transformation of the adjacent MoS₂layers from 2H‐to‐1T phase in the multilayered MoS₂. This local phase transition is attributed to partial ionization of Li and charge redistribution around the metal atoms and is followed by subsequent lattice straining. In addition, the stability of single‐phase vs. multiphase intercalated microstructures, and the origins of structural changes accompanying Li‐ion insertion are investigated at atomic scales.